Order the answer to: 1. What were the key…
Question | 1. What were the key differences between the two firms’ bidding strategies? Be specific. 2. What might J&J have done differently to avoid igniting a bidding war? 3. What evidence is given that J&J may not have seen Boston Scientific as a serious bidder? 4. Explain how differing assumptions about market growth, potential synergies, and the size of the potential liability related to product recalls affected the bidding. Johnson & Johnson, the behemoth American pharmaceutical company, announced an agreement in December 2004 to acquire Guidant for $76 per share for a combination of cash and stock. Guidant is a leading manufacturer of implantable heart defibrillators and other products used in angioplasty procedures. The defibrillator market has been growing at 20% annually, and J&J desired to reenergize its slowing growth rate by diversifying into this rapidly growing market. Soon after the agreement was signed, Guidant’s defibrillators became embroiled in a regulatory scandal over failure to inform doctors about rare malfunctions. Guidant suffered a serious erosion of market share when it recalled five models of its defibrillators. |
---|---|
Subject | business-corporate-finance |
Have a writer answer this question by clicking below. If you have any questions you can contact us via live chat.